Steve Atkins
28-03-2003, 22:24
Overseas Branches ? A Conundrum
Dear fellow BSAC members,
I am the Dive Officer for Branch 51, the Jamaica Sub-Aqua Club, BSAC?s first overseas branch. Since being formed in 1957 our membership has risen and fallen with the seasons and people on expatriate contracts. Over recent years our numbers have averaged 15 and we are currently finding it hard to draw-in new members. With such a small membership we do not have a diver-training programme to help improve our viability, in the face of the PADI competition.
The situation is compounded by the fact that we appear to have very little in return from BSAC HQ UK ? we receive little response from telephone calls and emails, while letters are a write-off. We had thought that we could entice new members with the third party insurance liability, but it seems that this not the case. Last year we had 66 club dives off the Jamaican coast, all without incident. However, as most of our boat diving is made from local fisher boats or canoes, our third party buddy insurance cover is invalidated, as quite naturally, these fishermen carry no insurance. Another point to note is that in the unlikely event that a third party claim is made, the odds are that they would be brokered under US or Canadian jurisdiction, again invalidating BSAC?s support to its Jamaican members.
We are questioning if it is worthwhile continuing to dive under the BSAC banner. I wonder if any other club, or member, has successfully addressed these problems without undermining its BSAC affiliation.
Any comments would be gratefully received.
Regards
Dear fellow BSAC members,
I am the Dive Officer for Branch 51, the Jamaica Sub-Aqua Club, BSAC?s first overseas branch. Since being formed in 1957 our membership has risen and fallen with the seasons and people on expatriate contracts. Over recent years our numbers have averaged 15 and we are currently finding it hard to draw-in new members. With such a small membership we do not have a diver-training programme to help improve our viability, in the face of the PADI competition.
The situation is compounded by the fact that we appear to have very little in return from BSAC HQ UK ? we receive little response from telephone calls and emails, while letters are a write-off. We had thought that we could entice new members with the third party insurance liability, but it seems that this not the case. Last year we had 66 club dives off the Jamaican coast, all without incident. However, as most of our boat diving is made from local fisher boats or canoes, our third party buddy insurance cover is invalidated, as quite naturally, these fishermen carry no insurance. Another point to note is that in the unlikely event that a third party claim is made, the odds are that they would be brokered under US or Canadian jurisdiction, again invalidating BSAC?s support to its Jamaican members.
We are questioning if it is worthwhile continuing to dive under the BSAC banner. I wonder if any other club, or member, has successfully addressed these problems without undermining its BSAC affiliation.
Any comments would be gratefully received.
Regards